Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: new feature: LDAP database name resolution

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new feature: LDAP database name resolution
Date: 2006-02-28 13:14:01
Message-ID: 44044C99.9060906@pse-consulting.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Albe Laurenz wrote:
> I am now in the process of writing a patch against CVS HEAD that
> changes fe-connect.c as follows:
> 
> - If there is a 'service' option or PGSERVICE is set,


A little off-topic, but related: PeterE recently complained about an 
option in pgAdmin which is called "service". Its name originates from 
Windows where service is commonly a process running under control of the 
  service control manager (SCM), comparable to the init process; so for 
win32 the naming is accurate. On *ix, pgAdmin accepts a path to pg_ctl 
or a script used to control the local postmaster as in /etc/init.d.

It's probably a Good Thing (tm) if new features try to avoid possible 
name conflicts with common terms.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-02-28 13:16:10
Subject: Re: Dead Space Map
Previous:From: Nikolay SamokhvalovDate: 2006-02-28 13:11:50
Subject: Re: Sequences/defaults and pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group