Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Date: 2006-02-27 19:24:05
Message-ID: 440351D5.2060905@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew,

> How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more 
> inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only 
> extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is 
> essentially droppable.

AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any 
particular name.  I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a 
more generic schema name.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-02-27 19:27:44
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-02-27 19:20:55
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group