Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What's with this lib suffix?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: What's with this lib suffix?
Date: 2006-02-26 20:59:50
Message-ID: 440216C6.1080807@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> Enumkit's makefile uses pgxs happily to make foo.so without the lib 
>> prefix. The relevant portion reads like this:
>>
>> MODULES = $(TYPENAME)
>>
> Yeah. But using MODULES your are assumed to have one object file per 
> module. I need to use MODULE_big.



Yes, I see that now.

Maybe we should add a MODULE_dyn target to pgxs.mk.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Clark C. EvansDate: 2006-02-26 21:17:31
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2006-02-26 20:19:45
Subject: Re: TOAST compression

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group