Re: sequence data type

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sequence data type
Date: 2017-02-10 20:39:14
Message-ID: 43a1c152-1a20-e12f-7447-3e00e0ebfe2e@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/1/17 10:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> And here is a rebased patch for the original feature. I think this
>>> addresses all raised concerns and suggestions now.
>>
>> Thanks for the new version. That looks good to me after an extra lookup.
>
> Moved to CF 2017-03.

committed, thanks

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-02-10 21:08:28 Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-10 20:33:51 Re: log_autovacuum_min_duration doesn't log VACUUMs