Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for
Date: 2006-02-20 04:47:48
Message-ID: 43F949F4.8020607@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Relating to this.  If anyone can find govt or other free db's and 
convert them into pgsql format, I will host them on the dbsamples page. 
  The dbsamples are _really_ popular!

Chris

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:51, Ron wrote:
>> I assume we have such?
> 
> Depends on what you wanna do.
> For transactional systems, look at some of the stuff OSDL has done.
> 
> For large geospatial type stuff, the government is a good source, like
> www.usgs.gov or the fcc transmitter database.
> 
> There are other ones out there.  Really depends on what you wanna test.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Virag SaksenaDate: 2006-02-20 06:42:23
Subject: Re: Avoiding cartesian product
Previous:From: andrewDate: 2006-02-20 04:06:12
Subject: How to optimize a JOIN with BETWEEN?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2006-02-20 06:58:11
Subject: Re: postgresql query string length limit
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-20 04:32:53
Subject: Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group