Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures

From: Rikard Pavelic <rikard(dot)pavelic(at)zg(dot)htnet(dot)hr>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
Date: 2006-01-21 07:59:28
Message-ID: 43D1E9E0.3000905@zg.htnet.hr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> If you're dealing with something that's performance critical you're not
> going to be constantly re-connecting anyway, so I don't see what the
> issue is.
>   

I really missed your point.
In multi user environment where each user uses it's connection for 
identification
purposes, this seems like a reasonable optimization.

I know there is pgpool, but it's non windows, and it's not the best 
solution
for every other problem.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: RonDate: 2006-01-21 12:22:32
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very
Previous:From: Craig A. JamesDate: 2006-01-21 01:30:17
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creation of tsearch2 index is very slow

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group