| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ben Gould <ben(dot)gould(at)free(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2114: (patch) COPY FROM ... end of copy |
| Date: | 2005-12-27 14:51:08 |
| Message-ID: | 43B154DC.8090100@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The big problem is that \. is also a valid
>CSV data value (though not a valid non-CSV data value). So, the
>solution we came up with was to require \. to appear alone on a line in
>CSV mode for it to be treated as end-of-copy.
>
According to the docs, that's the way to specify EOD in both text and
CSV mode:
End of data can be represented by a single line containing just
backslash-period.
Your analysis regarding line_buf.len seems correct.
We probably should have a regression test with \. in a CSV field.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-27 15:15:28 | Re: BUG #2123: join between stored procedures |
| Previous Message | Guerra Antonio | 2005-12-27 08:28:45 | BUG #2133: can't reinstall postgresql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-27 17:45:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-27 12:50:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |