Re: pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.
Date: 2005-12-24 19:06:01
Message-ID: 43AD9C19.2040309@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

spelling error: s/surrouding/surrounding/

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Log Message:
>-----------
>Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.
>
>Modified Files:
>--------------
> pgsql/doc:
> FAQ_DEV (r1.102 -> r1.103)
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/FAQ_DEV.diff?r1=1.102&r2=1.103)
> pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
> FAQ_DEV.html (r1.105 -> r1.106)
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html.diff?r1=1.105&r2=1.106)
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-24 19:29:38 pgsql: Spell fix.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-24 18:37:17 pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.