Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Date: 2005-12-21 09:59:06
Message-ID: 43A9276A.2020608@logix-tt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Hi, Csaba,

Csaba Nagy wrote:

>>Another possible mapping would be to/from a Java boolean array. This has 
>>the problem that a Java array of booleans passed to setObject() should 
>>probably be mapped to an array of booleans on the server side, not to a 
>>bit(n) type.
> 
> What about a java.util.BitSet ? Or does it have to extend PGObject ?

Currently, all Objects have either to be special cased inside the
driver, or extend PGObject (which does not allow binary transfer).

There were several ideas to change this, but AFAIR none of them was
implemented.

Markus

-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2005-12-21 12:41:30
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Previous:From: Csaba NagyDate: 2005-12-21 09:32:29
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group