Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Date: 2005-12-21 09:59:06
Message-ID: 43A9276A.2020608@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi, Csaba,

Csaba Nagy wrote:

>>Another possible mapping would be to/from a Java boolean array. This has
>>the problem that a Java array of booleans passed to setObject() should
>>probably be mapped to an array of booleans on the server side, not to a
>>bit(n) type.
>
> What about a java.util.BitSet ? Or does it have to extend PGObject ?

Currently, all Objects have either to be special cased inside the
driver, or extend PGObject (which does not allow binary transfer).

There were several ideas to change this, but AFAIR none of them was
implemented.

Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-12-21 12:41:30 Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2005-12-21 09:32:29 Re: Bug: Driver(8.2dev-500.jdbc3) does not handle