Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> I guess it depends on what you term as your metric for measurement.
> If it is just one query execution time .. It may not be the best on
> UltraSPARC T1.
> But if you have more than 8 complex queries running simultaneously,
> UltraSPARC T1 can do well compared comparatively provided the
> application can scale also along with it.
I just want to clarify one issue here. It's my understanding that the
8-core, 4 hardware thread (known as strands) system is seen as a 32 cpu
system by Solaris.
So, one could have up to 32 postgresql processes running in parallel on
the current systems (assuming the application can scale).
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: David Lang||Date: 2005-12-20 15:08:21|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1|
|Previous:||From: David Roussel||Date: 2005-12-20 15:00:30|
|Subject: Re: 2 phase commit: performance implications?|