Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> I like this, but not because I want to read it myself, but because I
>>>> want to make autovacuum responsible for re-allocating free space
>>>> when it
>>>> runs out. This way we can have an autoFSM feature in 8.2
>>> Not wanting to denigrate value of the interesting but slightly OT
>>> direction this thread has taken - but does anybody want to
>>> comment/review the patch itself :-) ....?
>> I saw this question about a transaction block and your reply:
>> but no new patch. I know someone suggested pgfoundry but it seems most
>> natural in /contrib. Do you want to update the patch?
> In the expectation of further revisions, I was going to batch that one
> in with the 'rest' - given that there have not been any, I'll submit a
> revised patch.
Here it is - I seem to have had trouble sending any attachments to this
list recently. Bruce the patch (sent privately), so its in the patches
queue, but thought I would have another go at getting it to -patches so
others can review it more easily!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-12-16 21:34:56|
|Subject: Re: Web archive issue?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-16 20:33:14|
|Subject: Re: Improving planning of outer joins |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Pierre Girard||Date: 2005-12-16 21:35:57|
|Subject: Re: Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not have native|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-16 20:56:07|
|Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options |