Re: Improving planning of outer joins

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving planning of outer joins
Date: 2005-12-16 02:19:10
Message-ID: 43A2241E.7070005@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'm not sure whether we'd need any additional planner knobs to control
> this. I think that the existing join_collapse_limit GUC variable should
> continue to exist, but its effect on left/right joins will be the same as
> for inner joins. If anyone wants to force join order for outer joins more
> than for inner joins, we'd need some other control setting, but I don't
> currently see why that would be very useful.
>
> Does this seem like a reasonable agenda, or am I thinking too small?

I think it's fantastic - it's a big complaint about planning we see
often in the IRC channel.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-16 02:19:20 Re: Improving planning of outer joins
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2005-12-16 02:02:55 Re: Which qsort is used