Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Schema bug

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema bug
Date: 2005-12-12 23:29:01
Message-ID: 439E07BD.1060504@phlo.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
 > Florian G. Pflug wrote:
 >> I'd prefer system-catalogs being excluded by name - preferably the
 >> exclusion-list would be editable, and part of the pgadmin preferences.
 >> Seems more transparent to me - and future-proof, in the sense that
 >> even if a future postgres version chooses to rename some catalog, the
 >> user will be able to just add the new names to the exclusion list.
 >
 > There's already a database restriction and a schema restriction, just
 > use it.
Ups... Should have checked before posting... Doesn't invalidate my 
point, though ;-)

BTW, I just checked the postgresql CVS, and found the in the beginnings
of schema-support in pgsql, the public schema had oid 2071. It got
changed to 2200 before 7.3 was released, though.

greetings, Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-12-12 23:37:54
Subject: Re: Schema bug
Previous:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-12-12 23:00:58
Subject: Re: Schema bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group