Re: Schema bug

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema bug
Date: 2005-12-12 23:00:58
Message-ID: 439E012A.50303@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Florian G. Pflug wrote:

>
> I'd prefer system-catalogs being excluded by name - preferably the
> exclusion-list would be editable, and part of the pgadmin preferences.
> Seems more transparent to me - and future-proof, in the sense that
> even if a future postgres version chooses to rename some catalog, the
> user will be able to just add the new names to the exclusion list.

There's already a database restriction and a schema restriction, just
use it.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2005-12-12 23:29:01 Re: Schema bug
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2005-12-12 22:53:04 Re: Schema bug