Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com>, Bill Bartlett <bbartlett(at)softwareanalytics(dot)com>, Fredrik Olsson <fredrik(dot)olsson(at)treyst(dot)se>
Subject: Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions
Date: 2005-11-24 10:56:41
Message-ID: 43859C69.9040408@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Why do you use "GRANT ALL" and not "GRANT SELECT, UPDATE"? All means everybody
> can do bad things with those sequences.

GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT & UPDATE.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A. Kretschmer 2005-11-24 11:24:50 Re: Private email requests
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-11-24 10:13:14 Re: BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept