Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?
Date: 2009-09-17 21:31:16
Message-ID: 4385.1253223076@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> basically - shouldn't this command raise error instead of creating index
> named "concurrently"?

No.  That would mean that "concurrently" is a reserved word.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: AnnitaDate: 2009-09-18 09:45:52
Subject: BUG #5063: MS Access crashes by quiting after linking tables with PostgreSQL
Previous:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2009-09-17 19:59:06
Subject: shouldn't "create unique index concurrently on x (i)" raise error?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group