Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packed short varlenas, what next?
Date: 2007-02-28 16:15:30
Message-ID: 4382.1172679330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that last night myself. In particular the GIST modules seems to
> be a major problem. they define dozens of new objects, many of which are just
> passing around C data structures internally but some of which are objects
> which get stored in the database. I have no idea which are which and which
> ones are varlenas.

FWIW, when I went to bed last night I had hstore and intarray working,
but was still fooling with ltree. Didn't get to the others yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-02-28 16:23:49 Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-28 16:09:38 Re: VACUUM and spoiling the buffer manager cache