Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-11-17 18:06:36
Message-ID: 437CC6AC.3030705@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> They're not exactly easy to setup for the casual user (well, I assume
> replicator isn't but it's not relevant to the majority of our users
> anyway).
>   
Well FYI any half way competent person can set up replicator in 30 
minutes or less ;), that said
in place upgrades are a feature that will take up a lot of man power 
EVERY release I would think.

I could be wrong but I would rather see the resources put into other things.

J
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>   


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-11-18 00:15:39
Subject: Minor comment update for DELETE
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-17 17:48:45
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group