Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Documentation typos

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation typos
Date: 2005-10-14 01:30:22
Message-ID: 434F0A2E.1020909@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> So what? I just don't see consistency as being a value in itself, but 
> only when it has some other merit. Clearly you don't agree, but I am 
> with Emerson on the subject of consistency.

So you're saying you're consistent in your objections to consistency? :)


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-14 01:53:14
Subject: Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-13 22:56:06
Subject: Re: Make 2PC error messages match docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group