Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:45:03 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Oracle has a tendency to keep things around forever, which is nice, but
> over the years it produces a system with lots of strange features that
> make the system hard to use. PostgreSQL has a tendency to remove old,
> unused stuff over time to keep the system easy to understand. This is
> part of the reason we have not added CONCAT, because it doesn't really
> add new functionality to the vast majority of our users.
>
> Sure, if someone wants to write scripts that work with PostgreSQL and
> Oracle EBCDIC machines, it would be nice to have, but for 99% of our
> users, it is just added cruft, and we have a tendency to try to reduce
> cruft rather than make 1% of people happy, especially when the
> extensibility system of PostgreSQL allows users to create their own
> CONCAT functions if they desire.

Where does textcat fit into things?

klint.

+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
: Klint Gore : "Non rhyming :
: EMail : kg(at)kgb(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au : slang - the :
: Snail : A.B.R.I. : possibilities :
: Mail University of New England : are useless" :
: Armidale NSW 2351 Australia : L.J.J. :
: Fax : +61 2 6772 5376 : :
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+