Re: ResultSet#xxxTimestamp for DATE column unexpected behavior

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: dircha <dircha(at)dircha(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ResultSet#xxxTimestamp for DATE column unexpected behavior
Date: 2005-09-29 23:10:02
Message-ID: 433C744A.9030506@ejurka.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

dircha wrote:
> Both issues I mentioned appear to have been fixed; the behavior is
> as expected.
>
> Great.
>
> Is there any word yet on which official build these changes might be
> expected to be present in, in terms of the labeling used on the pgsql-
> jdbc downloads page? Will there be another 8.0-xxx.jdbc3.jar, or would
> these changes go into a forthcoming stable 8.1-xxx.jdbc3.jar?
>

The timestamp changes will not make their way into the 8.0 series
because they are too big. The 8.1 development series will become the
official stable release when the 8.1 server version officially releases.
I hope to put up a new 8.1 development release next week.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2005-09-29 23:19:02 Re: GSSAPI or Kerberos authentication problems
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2005-09-29 23:05:43 Re: getColumnClassName() and getObject() types differ for