Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-27 04:54:46
Message-ID: 4338D096.5050500@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>[ raised eyebrow... ]  Has bizgres obtained a crystal ball from
>somewhere?  There is *no* way anyone could provide you anything that
>has any legitimate claim on the name "PG 8.2" three months from now.
>  
>

I **think** what he meant was that depending on what Bizgres has done in 
the next three
months they may not run 8.1 but run Bizgres instead.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>			regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>  
>


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-09-27 05:03:25
Subject: Re: unchecked malloc
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-09-27 04:19:36
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group