Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-26 23:16:00
Message-ID: 43388130.6050006@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>If we want to have some sort of fixed policy for support lifespan, I
>would suggest it be like "X amount of time after the release of the
>following major version".  But X probably has to depend on how big
>the compatibility gotchas are in the following version, so we're still
>really talking about a judgment call here.
>
>
>  
>

I'm not sure that that's going to help users much. I should think around 
3 years (or some such predictable period) is a reasonable lifetime goal 
for a piece of software like this, accompanied by some weasel words. 
Maybe something like this would do: "We will attempt to maintain support 
of each major version for 3 years after its release, although this will 
not always be possible. After that time any major support requirement is 
likely to result in support being ended."

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-09-27 00:01:31
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-09-26 23:05:28
Subject: Re: Database file compatability

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group