Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Could autovacuum emit log messages as soon as it sees such tables and start
> dropping them at some point later?
We might have to rearrange the logic a bit to make that happen (I'm not
sure what order things get tested in), but a log message does seem like
a good idea. I'd go for logging anytime an orphaned table is seen,
and dropping once it's past the anti-wraparound horizon.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2008-06-27 16:36:56|
|Subject: Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Saito||Date: 2008-06-27 16:33:03|
|Subject: Re: MSVC 2003 compile error with pg8.3.3|