From: | Aldor <an(at)mediaroot(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication |
Date: | 2005-09-23 09:12:33 |
Message-ID: | 4333C701.2080107@mediaroot.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
>Are there any non-statement level solution? Something that appends to
the WAL
>> on the slave server?
For this kind of solution I'm also looking for a while - but in the
meantime you can also take a look at "slony" - it can do really many
things. Don't give up at the beginning, after you've understood how it
works you will like it ;-)
Craig Servin wrote:
> Are there any non-statement level solution? Something that appends to the WAL
> on the slave server?
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:28 pm, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
>>There's also pgcluster, but keep in mind that these are all
>>statement-level replication solutions which have some rather big
>>gotchas.
>>
>>On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:24:31PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 02:02, the vespadict wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi ,
>>>>
>>>>I want high Availability but I don't need load balance. I need sync
>>>>replication if is posible using two way.
>>>
>>>If you need sync, then pgpool may be a good choice, or client side
>>>replication like C-JDBC or something like that.
>>>
>>>pgpool doesn't HAVE to do load balancing, it can do simple two way sync
>>>replication if that's what you need.
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Buschini | 2005-09-23 11:48:33 | COPY TO / COPY FROM |
Previous Message | Hannes Dorbath | 2005-09-23 07:51:02 | Re: vacuum message |