Tom Lane wrote:
>Is it really necessary to hack up the grammar for this? Seems like
>you should create ordinary functions to manipulate the datatype(s).
>If every datatype thought it could do this sort of thing, we'd have
>a completely unmanageable grammar.
Can we do variadic functions without hacking the grammar? My impression
was that we could not. Maybe we need a generic mechanism for that?
Peter said here (more or less uncontradicted) that hacking the grammar
would be required for these functions:
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2005-09-12 14:38:06|
|Subject: Autovacuum docs|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-09-12 14:27:24|
|Subject: Re: SQL/XML publishing function experimental patch|