Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-25 20:33:13
Message-ID: 432.1217017993@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Wouldn't it provide even more benefit if these were maintained
> as independent modules *outside* of core but still by the core team.

This part of the core team isn't willing to do that. I've got enough
work to do without trying to keep multiple repositories in sync.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-25 20:53:02 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-25 20:31:26 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode