Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information?

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information?
Date: 2005-08-30 21:36:13
Message-ID: 4314D14D.2070205@pse-consulting.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> 
>>Unfortunately, it's not at all obvious how to accomplish that :-(.
> 
> 
> I don't think it can be easily done with the current code.  This is
> plpgsql code, right?  There are some ways to cause recompilation for
> those, at least on the 8.1 code I'm looking at.

Well at least when a procedure is dropped, its cached plans could be 
dropped as well (apparently the cache plan is located trough some kind 
of hash, not the pg_proc.oid?). I do understand that the usual case, a 
table oid changed while cached inside a procedure isn't easily 
detectable because it would require dependency information generated 
from procedure's source.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2005-08-30 22:08:47
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Re: dangling lock information?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-30 20:36:16
Subject: Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group