| From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spikewatch testing |
| Date: | 2005-08-26 22:38:10 |
| Message-ID: | 430F99D2.9080009@travelamericas.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>>Is it worth trying to promote this as a way to promote PostgreSQL? Also,
>>is it worth trying to improve our test coverage?
>>
>>
>
>Actually, they'll be running a contest (with prizes up to $2500) for
>improved test coverage for OSS applications. I've been trying to get
>someone to commit to helping me on the contest, so that PostgreSQL can
>participate.
>
>
>
What is involved in this? Maybe if you give specifics one of us can
commit to helping :-)
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-08-26 22:43:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Spikewatch testing |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-26 22:37:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Spikewatch testing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-08-26 22:43:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Spikewatch testing |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-26 22:37:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Spikewatch testing |