Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)seznam(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Date: 2005-08-25 22:12:04
Message-ID: 430E4234.4050903@seznam.cz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Possibly, but that's apparently not the only problem.  I'm looking at
> the first buildfarm result with this patch,
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2005-08-25%2018:56:02
> 
> The interesting part is the postmaster log at the bottom:
> 
> LOG:  could not bind IPv4 socket: No error
> HINT:  Is another postmaster already running on port 55678? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
> WARNING:  could not create listen socket for "localhost"
> FATAL:  could not create any TCP/IP sockets
> 
> Apparently, access to IPv4 sockets isn't working either (and the "No
> error" isn't very helpful; would seem we're not reading the right
> status value).

/me kicks brother out of winXP machine to see whats going on

Yep those changes proposed in my previous email fixes IPv4 too.

LOG:  database system was shut down at 2005-08-26 00:05:51 [removed 
unreadable chars :)]
LOG:  checkpoint record is at 0/390CE0
LOG:  redo record is at 0/390CE0; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
LOG:  next transaction ID: 562; next OID: 10791
LOG:  next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
LOG:  database system is ready
LOG:  transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484144, limited by database 
"postgres"

Looks ok, i don't know what IPv4 has to do with all of this though.


-- 
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-25 22:15:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-08-25 22:01:25
Subject: Re: Stuff running slooow

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-25 22:15:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-25 21:51:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group