Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Well, the Linux Trademark Institute has been around for a long time, and
>> I have seen places where they state that the Linux trademark is owned by
>> I think in this case they are doing much more damage to Linux by
>> enforcing the trademark than the possible damage caused by negative use
>> of the trademark.
>> I am worried about companies being scared to promote PostgreSQL because
>> of trademark concerns.
> Which was why, as we discussed on -core, Josh was looking into
> drafting up a "Public License" for this ... you may have been
> travelling while this was discussed though?
That is a capital idea.
Metatron Technology Consulting
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Karim A Nassar||Date: 2005-08-24 08:43:25|
|Subject: Openbase makes false claims about postgresql|
|Previous:||From: Chris Travers||Date: 2005-08-20 04:36:13|
|Subject: Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL|