Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6
Date: 2005-08-19 18:16:38
Message-ID: 43062206.3010404@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Merlin Moncure wrote:

>Joshua wrote:
>  
>
>>NT4 is dead. Let it die. It is very, very old and no longer supported
>>by Microsoft.
>>
>>2000+ should be the minimum.
>>
>>Just curious but would PostgreSQL compile on RedHat 6.2 and run?
>>
>>    
>>
>Windows NT 4.0 was released in Jul of 1996.  The official release of red
>had linux at that time was 3.04 with the upcoming 4.0 in beta.
>
>Just to put things into perspective :).
>
>
>  
>

All this is irrelevant to the present discussion, as W2K does not 
support what I tried to do.

In any case, EOL date matters far more than release date, and how many 
users there still are matters even more than either date. RH7.3 has been 
EOLed for some time, but I see huge amounts of it still in data centers.


cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-08-19 18:36:25
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2005-08-19 18:02:32
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group