Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a
Date: 2005-08-19 05:07:28
Message-ID: 43056910.60907@opencloud.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:

> What is the story on JDBC COPY support, anyway?  I'm aware that there's
> an unofficial patch for that, but I'm not clear about why it's not made
> it into the accepted version.

I didn't like the whole "here is an undifferentiated stream of data"
approach -- there were some JDBC interfaces we could adapt to read/write
typed data. That never happened, though.

I suppose we could apply a patch similar to the original one, given that
there doesn't seem like much interest in a typed version, but it's
likely to need rework as there's been at least one overhaul of the
driver's protocol handling layer since then.

-O

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2005-08-19 05:09:54
Subject: Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-19 05:03:37
Subject: Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2005-08-19 05:09:54
Subject: Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-19 05:03:37
Subject: Re: BUG #1830: Non-super-user must be able to copy from a

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group