Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type
Date: 2005-08-18 03:55:43
Message-ID: 430406BF.2040406@opencloud.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-jdbc
Joseph Shraibman wrote:

>> The column's type is 'xid' which the driver doesn't currently handle, 
>> so it gets put into the "wrap it in PGobject" bucket.
> 
> Is xid a type of number?

It's an internal backend type; I'm not familiar with the details.

>> Perhaps your server should convert instances of PGobject to their 
>> string representations before returning them across RMI.
> 
> That's what I'll do.  Are there any other classes besides 
> org.postgresql.util.PGobject that I have to worry about?

There are other classes for things like intervals and the geometric 
types, but they should all be subclasses of PGobject.

-O

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-08-18 04:10:44
Subject: Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2005-08-18 03:48:52
Subject: Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-08-18 04:10:44
Subject: Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2005-08-18 03:48:52
Subject: Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group