| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Date: | 2005-08-18 03:27:33 |
| Message-ID: | 43040025.9070603@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Is it a jdbc bug that
> is returning the answer as org.postgresql.util.PGobject instead of some
> kind of Number?
The column's type is 'xid' which the driver doesn't currently handle, so
it gets put into the "wrap it in PGobject" bucket.
I'm not sure what's changed between 7.4 & 8.0 -- did you also change
JDBC driver versions?
Perhaps your server should convert instances of PGobject to their string
representations before returning them across RMI.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:48:52 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:05:25 | pg_locks.transaction field type |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:48:52 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:05:25 | pg_locks.transaction field type |