Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov>
Cc: David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Date: 2005-08-10 03:28:13
Message-ID: 42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
>>
>>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?
> 
> 
> DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons.  DBI is very well supported.
> More importantly, almost all database-related work is done by building on
> DBI.  Interfacing your own code with those of others is then relatively
> straightforward.  See, for some examples, DBIx::RecordSet or Class::DBI.
> Finally, if you every need to port to another database product (GASP!), DBI
> is fairly easy to adapt (depending on DB-specific SQL).

DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


In response to

Responses

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: jtvDate: 2005-08-10 03:51:48
Subject: Re: Getting results after networking error
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-10 03:07:53
Subject: Re: Getting results after networking error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group