Andrew - Supernews wrote:
>On 2005-07-27, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:
>>So far the problem does seem to be specific to whatever PL/pgSQL's
>>is doing, and it affects ROW_COUNT as well as RESULT_OID. I haven't
>>been able to reproduce the problem with PL/Tcl or with C and SPI.
>src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c, function exec_stmt_getdiag, uninitialized
nice catch. I see the "= false" removed in about 5 places in this
Is this the only one that matters?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2005-07-27 19:53:40|
|Subject: Integrated autovacuum|
|Previous:||From: Andrew - Supernews||Date: 2005-07-27 18:21:07|
|Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug|