Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RESULT_OID Bug

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug
Date: 2005-07-27 18:57:57
Message-ID: 42E7D935.90105@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews wrote:

>On 2005-07-27, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:
>  
>
>>So far the problem does seem to be specific to whatever PL/pgSQL's
>>is doing, and it affects ROW_COUNT as well as RESULT_OID.  I haven't
>>been able to reproduce the problem with PL/Tcl or with C and SPI.
>>    
>>
>
>src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c, function exec_stmt_getdiag, uninitialized
>variable "isnull".
>
>  
>

nice catch. I see the "= false" removed in about 5 places in this 
change: 
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c.diff?r1=1.146;r2=1.147

Is this the only one that matters?

cheers

(another) andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-07-27 19:53:40
Subject: Integrated autovacuum
Previous:From: Andrew - SupernewsDate: 2005-07-27 18:21:07
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group