Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: regression failure on latest CVS

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"'pgsql-hackers list'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Date: 2005-07-27 13:30:51
Message-ID: 42E78C8B.8000103@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:

>In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
>correct it?
>
>I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
>have/want the patch installed.
>
>  
>

All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround 
for now would be to compile with optimisation turned off. Or use another 
compiler - gcc is available isn't it?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2005-07-27 13:36:11
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Previous:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-07-27 13:16:52
Subject: Re: RESULT_OID Bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group