Re: regression failure on latest CVS

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers list'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Date: 2005-07-27 13:30:51
Message-ID: 42E78C8B.8000103@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:

>In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
>correct it?
>
>I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
>have/want the patch installed.
>
>
>

All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround
for now would be to compile with optimisation turned off. Or use another
compiler - gcc is available isn't it?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2005-07-27 13:36:11 Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-27 13:16:52 Re: RESULT_OID Bug