Luke Lonergan wrote:
> On 7/21/05 7:53 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>Well I know that isn't true at least not with ANY of the Dells my
>>customers have purchased in the last 18 months. They are still really,
> That's too bad, can you cite some model numbers? SCSI?
Yeah I will get them and post, but yes they are all SCSI.
>>I have great success with Silicon Image as long as I am running them
>>with Linux software RAID. The LSI controllers are also really nice.
> That's good to hear, I gave up on Silicon Image controllers on Linux about 1
> year ago, which kernel are you using with success?
Any of the 2.6 kernels. ALso the laster 2.4 (+22 I believe) support it
pretty well as well.
> controllers are the most popular, so it's important to see them supported
> well, though I'd rather see more SATA headers than 2 off of the built-in
> - Luke
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Madison Kelly||Date: 2005-07-22 15:09:32|
|Subject: Solved (was: Re: Another index question)|
|Previous:||From: Sam Mason||Date: 2005-07-22 14:51:22|
|Subject: Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Rocco Altier||Date: 2005-07-22 16:21:08|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regressin failure on latest CVS|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2005-07-22 14:43:05|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated|