Tom Lane wrote:
>Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>>On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>If it's a matter of whether VACUUM removes rows or not, that's expected:
>>>open-transaction bookkeeping is done across the whole cluster. (This is
>>>not something simple to change, since we may have to consider
>>>transaction IDs in shared catalogs.)
>>I wonder if this restriction could be lifted if we tracked last-vacuum-
>>Xid per relation?
>No, that's unrelated. What is of concern is the open-transaction
From a Slony-I users standpoint - the idle transactions cause
pg_listener bloat, which can impact replication performance on busy sites.
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-07-21 14:50:24|
|Subject: Re: Statement logging per connection|
|Previous:||From: Alexander Stanier||Date: 2005-07-21 14:21:18|
|Subject: Re: FATAL: could not read statistics message|