Re: jdbc cts final diff for review

Dave Cramer wrote:
> Did you read my reasons for the ugly if double, then float stuff ?

Haven't had time to get my head around that yet.. can you translate it
to an explanation of something in the JDBC spec that we don't do
correctly? It's a bit hard to understand what's going wrong without the
CTS code to hand..

> I think it can be removed, however I think sooner than later we will be
> dealing
> with more complex parameters when stored procedures with real IN/OUT parms

Well, let's add the complexity only when we need it..

>> I still think they are redundant and should be entirely removed. We can
>> do that afterwards though.
>
> If absolutely necessary, however I don't think setObject with a
> different type is
> in the critical path

I'll hack on it if I have time after this is all applied; don't worry
about it for now since it's already in HEAD.

>> Why the repackaging?
>
> can't remember now.

Can you avoid repackaging then? Less CVS churn..

-O