Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wierd panic with 7.4.7

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wierd panic with 7.4.7
Date: 2005-06-28 17:41:43
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> There are a couple of big problems with this theory, though.  In the
> first place, there aren't any messages sent to the client during
> post-commit; unless possibly it's an error message due to a failure
> during post-commit, and that should have shown up in the server log.
> In the second place, we don't treat communication failures as ERRORs,
> so how did step 3 happen?
> Do you know what the dead client was doing?

Unfortunately I don't. We didn't have PID logging turned on so I can't 
tell which process it was. The only thing I was told was,

"I am running a Full Vacuum, CRAP the server just died ;)"

>  Can you reproduce this?

Let me see if the client has a dev database we can try to reproduce with.


Joshua D. Drake

> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG -

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-28 17:54:17
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2005-06-28 17:30:25
Subject: Re: CVS tip build failure (win32)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group