From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Denis Lussier <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 |
Date: | 2005-06-26 22:16:41 |
Message-ID: | 42BF2949.1090307@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:44:13PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>>Is the intention here to make PSM a first class language (i.e. handled
>>by the main dbengine scanner/parser) of just another PL? If the latter
>>it seems far less worth doing. Doing this as a first class language,
>>however, would be great, just great.
>>
>>
>
>I've seen some example code on the EnterpriseDB website using their SPL
>language, and it doesn't seem to be handled like "just another PL". The
>function body does not look at all like quoted strings, as in our
>regular PLs. I don't know how they did it, but I don't think they added
>support for the whole language to the main parser.
>
>
>
It could be done by putting the SPL parser in front of the SQL parser.
Maybe Luss will tell us how it was done ;-)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-06-27 00:41:39 | Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review requested |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-06-26 22:06:32 | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 |