Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: sgoldstein(at)apache(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin
Date: 2005-06-24 05:07:17
Message-ID: 42BB9505.3030005@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
PostgreSQL 8 for windows faster AND more reliable :)

Chris

Scott Goldstein wrote:
> I'm currently trying to make a decision on whether to use the Cygwin 
> port of Postgres 7.4 or Postgres 8.0 for a windows installation.  Can 
> someone provide some comparison info from a performance point of view?  
> I was thinking that the Cygwin port has the overhead of the translation 
> layer, but 8.0 is a newer product and may still have performance issue.  
> Can anyone comment on this? 
>  
> Thanks for the help.
>  
> Scott


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-24 13:40:27
Subject: Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin
Previous:From: Scott GoldsteinDate: 2005-06-24 04:32:54
Subject: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group