Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it's certainly hopeless to expect "patch" to fix it :-(. But the
> further the code drifts the harder it gets to compare manually.
Sure, but I don't see how removing a few "register" qualifiers and so
forth is going to make the slightest difference to a manual comparison.
If the code was intentionally being kept as close to upstream as
possible, I wouldn't have made the changes in the first place -- but
since there is little prospect of doing a machine-assisted merge after
pgindent, I don't think this patch makes things appreciably worse.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-06-21 02:09:42|
|Subject: pg_restore: fix bogosity|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-06-20 23:53:58|
|Subject: Re: code cleanup for tz |