Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't
Date: 2005-06-20 15:20:54
Message-ID: 42B6DED6.7070806@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
You could also mention under limitations that it's not NULL-safe perhaps.

Chris


Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> 
>>Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL 
>>logging is a SMOP:
>>http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/limitations.html
> 
> 
> Ah, I did forget that one.  Thanks.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2005-06-20 15:22:39
Subject: pgsql: fix founded hole in recovery after crash, add
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-20 14:54:03
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group