You could also mention under limitations that it's not NULL-safe perhaps.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL
>>logging is a SMOP:
> Ah, I did forget that one. Thanks.
> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Teodor Sigaev||Date: 2005-06-20 15:22:39|
|Subject: pgsql: fix founded hole in recovery after crash, add |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-06-20 14:54:03|
|Subject: Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't |