Re: plperl strict mode

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl strict mode
Date: 2005-05-24 16:29:43
Message-ID: 42935677.2070603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>Yes, you can register a function as "validator" during language
>creation. AFAIR there are no validator functions except SQL and
>plpgsql, so you would have to create one for plperl ...
>
>
>

Excellent. We'll definitely work on that. Not having this has annoyed me
(and I'm sure others) in the past.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-24 17:09:34 Re: plperl tests for currently untested features
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-05-24 16:15:26 Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.