Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Sándor Miglécz <sandor(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Date: 2010-01-13 05:11:47
Message-ID: 4290.1263359507@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> it has a hunk failed when trying to apply i guess it's because of
> Tom's refactor of relcache.c

If this patch is touching those parts of relcache.c, it probably needs
rethinking.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-01-13 05:34:26
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-01-13 05:10:27
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group