Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is there any other way to do this?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any other way to do this?
Date: 2005-05-18 02:12:35
Message-ID: 428AA493.4000806@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> This time it worked! But VACUUM FULL requires an exclusive lock on the 
> table which I don't really want to grant. So my question is: why is 
> VACUUM ANALYZE didn't do the job? Is there any setting I can tweak to 
> make a VACUUM without granting a exclusive lock?

You need to run normal vacuum analyze every few minutes or so, to stop 
it growing.  I suggest pg_autovacuum.

Chris

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Szűcs GáborDate: 2005-05-18 14:30:17
Subject: where+orderby+limit not (always) using appropriate index?
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-05-18 00:22:36
Subject: Tuning planner cost estimates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group