Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 18:34:24
Message-ID: 4277C430.9080807@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> On 4/30/05, Jim C. Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
>>pgfoundry on then? :)
>
>
> If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.

Well we already run it :) For pgFoundry and you are correct it seems to
be a bit of a pig. Our new machines should handle it better though.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:37:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2005-05-03 18:26:31 Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:37:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2005-05-03 18:33:30 Bogus assertion in multixact.c?